![]() ![]() The implicit justification for the recent push to increase video surveillance is the threat of terrorist attacks. VIDEO SURVEILLANCE HAS NOT BEEN PROVEN EFFECTIVE Capitol, the impulse to blanket our public spaces and streets with video surveillance is a bad idea. In lower Manhattan, for example, the police are planning to set up a centralized surveillance center where officers can view thousands of video cameras around the downtown – and police-operated cameras have proliferated in many other cities across America in just the past several years.Īlthough the ACLU has no objection to cameras at specific, high-profile public places that are potential terrorist targets, such as the U.S. The use of sophisticated systems by police and other public security officials is particularly troubling in a democratic society. Fears of terrorism and the availability of ever-cheaper cameras have accelerated the trend even more. Video cameras, or closed-circuit television (CCTV), are becoming a more and more widespread feature of American life. The Four Problems With Public Video Surveillance
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |